Where is pharmacy informatics headed?

Recently I read an interesting article in the American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. The question of what defines a pharmacy informaticist was raised. I’ve mused over that question many times myself. Because there is no standardized definition for a pharmacy informaticist, it is extremely difficult to define their role. A look at the many different job descriptions for IT pharmacists posted on the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) website is testimony to that.

Several key elements that contribute to the duties and expectations of an ideal pharmacy informaticist are discussed. They include:

1. Knowledge and understanding of pharmacy practice.

2. Knowledge and understanding of automation.

3. Project management skills.

4. Change-management skills.

5. Analytical skills.

6. Communications skills.

7. Understanding of basic software and database design.

8. Ability to follow program logic.

9. Familiarity with basic data management tools.

10. Familiarity with the automation devices currently available.

11. Familiarity with informatics standards and initiatives.

12. Risk analysis skills.

13. Acquisition/request for proposal (RFP) skills.

Unfortunately, the ideal definition fails to capture the current role of many pharmacy informaticists (a.k.a. IT Pharmacist, ISS Pharmacist, etc). Many IT pharmacists are involved in much more mundane tasks such as maintaining pharmacy formularies or creating and maintaining billing reports. Calls to investigate “printer problems” or reset forgotten passwords are not uncommon. Many of these issues certainly do not require the knowledge base of an IT pharmacist and often times pull them away from other important tasks.

The article reminds me of the differences between the “clinical pharmacists” role defined in pharmacy school and the “clinical pharmacists” role I stepped into as a licensed pharmacists. The difference was eye-opening and a little disappointing. The ideal informaticist role described in the article sounds challenging and exciting, but the reality hasn’t quite caught up with the expectation. While I believe advances in pharmacy technology demand a highly educated and skilled pharmacy informaticist, I’m afraid that the profession is still maturing and may take quite some time to evolve into the “ideal” practice.

2 thoughts on “Where is pharmacy informatics headed?”

  1. This is where you need to take a more aggressive stance. The “printer problem” is a help desk issue. I think you have to define your role, wrapped around those bullet points if that’s what you believe it should be. You’re definitely in a position to mold it into what it should be. It’s obvious people are still trying to figure this out, so do it for them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.