Major differences between proposed USP Chapter 800 and current USP Chapter 797

By | October 15, 2015

USP <800> is still in draft form. The official date of the chapter has not yet been determined and is dependent on several factors, but expect it to become official some time in mid to late 2016. And while USP <797> is in the process of being updated, the current version is still the one everyone has to live with.

Information contained in USP <800> is in addition to information found in USP Chapter <797> Pharmaceutical Compounding – Sterile Preparations and USP Chapter <795>  Pharmaceutical Compounding – Nonsterile Preparations.

In its current iteration, USP <797> and USP <800> requirements for hazardous drugs (HDs) differ.  However, HD compounding in the upcoming revision to <797> will be harmonized with Chapter <800>. Actually, it looks like USP will simply defer all HD compounding to USP <800>, which makes sense.

Until all the USP Chapters are on the same page, here are some highlighted differences between Chapters <800> and <797>:

  • Requirement of compounding supervisor
  • Applies to sterile as well as non-sterile compounding
  • No longer allowed to store, unpack, or manipulate HDs in positive pressure areas
  • Elimination of exemption that allowed low volumes of HDs to be compounded in a non-negative pressure room. All quantities of HDs must be compounded in a separate, negative pressure room
  • C-SCAs may be used to compound low- and medium-risk HDs
  • CSTDs are recommended for compounding and required for administration

Perhaps the greatest impact will come from elimination of the current USP <797> exemption for small volumes of HDs to be compounded in a positive pressure room. USP <800> handles this by allowing low- and medium-risk HDs to be compounded in a containment segregated compounding area (C-SCA). C-SCA is a new concept, and is defined as “a separate, negative pressure room with at least 12 air changes per hour (ACPH) for use when compounding HDs. Low- and medium-risk HD compounded sterile preparation (CSP) may be prepared in a BSC or compounding aseptic containment isolator (CACI) located in a C-SCA, provided the beyond-use date of the CSP does not exceed 12 hours“.

3 thoughts on “Major differences between proposed USP Chapter 800 and current USP Chapter 797

  1. Matthew

    Any recommendations where I may acquire training modules(written/video) for technicians, before starting TCT program. Recommendations for how many doses for initial validation, then QA after that?

  2. Jerry Fahrni Post author

    ASHP offers several training courses that include written material as well as video. They’re expensive though. If you’re just looking for reading material, a Google search for sterile compounding, USP <797>, or pharmacy compounding will give you more than you can handle. Pharmacy Practice News (http://www.pharmacypracticenews.com/default.aspx) and Pharmacy Purchasing & Produts (http://www.pppmag.com/) have lots of good, free content around sterile compounding.

    In reference to recommendations on initial validation and follow-up QA, USP <797> has extensive guidelines.

  3. Renz Path

    I like that you pointed out the number of differences between the USP 800n and that of 797 in terms of the requirements of compounding supervisor, the C-SCAs or the CSTDs. When my nephew was asking me about the likely differences between the two as it was part of his school assignment, I could not really figure out what to tell him. Since your article brought that out here, I can definitely show this to him to give him an idea and help him catch up with that also.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.