Several years ago there was a group of pharmacists taking a serious look at the long-time practice of having pharmacists review virtually all drug orders, sometimes referred to as nearly universal prospective order review (NUPOR). The argument for NUPOR is that it is needed to ensure complete, accurate orders. The argument against NUPOR is that itâ€™s expensive, time-consuming, and unnecessary in many instances. I fall into the latter category of pharmacists, i.e. NUPOR is an antiquated practice that needs to be done away with.
There are those that argue that doing away with NUPOR is dangerous and removes the pharmacist from the medication use process. Nothing could be further from the truth. By making NUPOR a requirement you have taken pharmacists out of the healthcare discussion. NUPORÂ forces pharmacists to be tied to a terminal when they could be doing other things.Â
The introduction of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) and Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) have created a perfect opportunity to change the concept of NUPOR.
Here are some scenarios to think about:
- Setting, a large acute care hospital with a busy Emergency Department (ED). Physicians frequently order boluses of NS, or other fluid. Does a 1L bolus of NS ordered for an adult patient in the ED really require verification by a pharmacist prior to administration? Ask yourself, as a pharmacist, what set of circumstances would cause you to reject such an order and call the physician?
- Setting, hospital OB-GYN unit. Adult patient comes in for delivery. Physician orders 50 mg of IV meperidine x1 for pain. The patient is in good health, labs are normal, and has no allergies to the medication. Is there any reason that such an order needs verification? What would cause you to reject it and call the physician?
- Setting, general medicine floor of a hospital. Elderly patient admitted following a minor surgical procedure. The patient is experiencing constipation secondary to the procedure and medication for pain. Physician orders a bisacodyl suppository or MOM x1 to help get things moving. Labs are ok, the patient has no allergies to the medication, and there are no significant drug interactions. Is there any reason that such an order would require a pharmacistâ€™s blessing?
The list goes on and on. I suppose one could argue that there could be potential for a physician to blow through a catastrophic problem with the drug order that would harm the patient. Sure, that could happen. However, I would argue that a good system would allow the healthcare system to place hard stops in places where there is genuine concern or potential for a problem.
I just donâ€™t see NUPOR as necessary in todayâ€™s healthcare environment, especially for those healthcare systems using EHRs and CPOE. Donâ€™t agree? Thatâ€™s cool. Use the comment section below to convince me Iâ€™m wrong, but make sure you have a good reason, because if you don’t, I’ll mock you in front of the other children.Â