Jerry Fahrni

Here’s an interesting article in the Journal of Pharmacy Practice. The article, Clinical Dilemmas and a Review of Strategies to Manage Drug Shortages appears online ahead of print (doi: 10.1177/0897190013482332). Unfortunately you’ll hit a paywall, so if you don’t have a subscription all you’ll get is the abstract.

That’s unfortunate because according to the article “The expanded phased approach outlined here [in the article] provides a consistent, systematic approach for the management of drug shortages“. You would think they’d want everyone to know about the expanded phased approach due to the “health care crisis” created by drug shortages. Just sayin’.

Abstract
———————————————-
Objective: The objectives of this article are to review the clinical implications of drug shortages highlighting patient safety, sedation, and oncology and introduce an expanded phase approach for the management of drug shortages. Data Sources: Literature retrieval was accessed through a PubMed search of English-language sources from January 1990 through April 2012 using the medical subject heading pharmaceutical preparations/supply and distribution and the general search term drug shortages. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All original prospective and retrospective studies, peer-reviewed guidelines, consensus statements, and review articles were evaluated for inclusion. Relevance was determined considering the therapeutic class, focus on drug shortages, and manuscript type. Data Synthesis: The increased number of drug shortages has created significant challenges for health care providers. Two particularly vulnerable populations are critically ill and oncology patients. A lack of therapeutic alternatives in critically ill patients may impact patient safety as well as treatment outcomes. Similarly, a chemotherapy agent in short supply may contribute to adverse outcomes in oncology patients. Conclusions: The mounting number of drug shortages has created a health care crisis, requiring changes in management strategies as well as clinical practice. The expanded phased approach outlined here provides a consistent, systematic approach for the management of drug shortages.

I came across an interesting article at the ISMP website this morning. The article details the results of a community pharmacy survey looking at what impact policies and procedures related to guaranteed prescription fill times have on medication errors. The results are predictable and scary.

“Eighty-three percent of pharmacists working at pharmacies with advertised time guarantees reported that the time guarantee was a contributing factor to dispensing errors; almost half of them (49%) felt this contributing factor was significant. In fact, 44% of pharmacists working in pharmacies with time guarantees reported a dispensing error they were personally involved in, which was directly attributed to rushing to fulfill the time guarantee.”

That right there is reason enough to not allow time guarantees when it come to filling a scripts.

Read the rest of the article, especially the table of pharmacists’ perspective on time guarantees. It’s worth a few minutes of your time.

Afterthought: Why do pharmacists continue to work in this environment? Do they like the work most of the time, and only hate it some of the time? I used to know a few pharmacists that worked in the retail sector of pharmacy, but they’ve all moved on. A couple went to work for PBM’s and two abandoned the profession altogether: one left pharmacy to become an accountant – he’s much happier these days – and another one just quit. I don’t know what she’s up to these days, but the last time we spoke she was dabbling in interior design.