The news that Google Reader is going to be sunset in July of this year has created somewhat of a panic among many, including myself. Â The internet has been abuzz with articles on potential replacements. Iâ€™m sure people will look at many of these and find something to meet their needs, but what Iâ€™ve found thus far has been disappointing. I assume thatâ€™s because Google Reader was truly more than just a RSSÂ aggregation tool for me.Â Â A lot of the functionality that I used was the result of many third party developers that wrote plugins and scripts to do everything from rearranging the information on the page to removing ads. Google Reader was popular and mature, and it showed.
I donâ€™t know how longÂ I’veÂ been using Google Reader, but I canâ€™t remember what I did before it existed. Google Reader was my Evernote before Evernote was even a product.
The loss of Google Reader has forced me to come to grips with a couple of truisms.Â First, Google provides some pretty incredible services for free. Letâ€™s face it, Iâ€™m deeply integrated into the Google way and I donâ€™t pay a dime for any of it. I use Gmail, Google Drive, Google Docs, YouTube, Google search, Google+, and Google Reader (while it lasts). But I donâ€™t pay for any of it. Should I expect more loyalty from a company that has given me everything for nothing in return? I donâ€™t know, but itâ€™s worth considering. And second, things in the cloud can be taken away in a snap.Â I’veÂ been beating the cloud drum for a few years now, and I believe in what it has to offer, but thereâ€™s a downside. I donâ€™t know how many items I haveÂ catalogedÂ in Google Reader, but itâ€™s a lot, going back several years. I have no idea what I’m going to do with that information.
Google Reader is fast and efficient. I can cover a lot of ground quickly and easily by navigating via the keyboard. I move from one article to another with ease. When I find an article that looks interesting I stop and read the first paragraph. If itâ€™s compelling Iâ€™ll expand it and read the whole thing. Simple.
How I use Google Reader:
1) Â Â Â A simple RSS aggregator â€“ Like many, I use Google Reader to aggregate all the websites that I read on a regular basis. Itâ€™s simple, but eloquent.
2)Â Â Â Â Â As a method to read journal table of contents (TOC) â€“ This is part of #1 above. There are services out there that will email the TOC of medical journals each time aÂ new issue is published. I grab the RSS feed from those journals and send them to Google Reader. So each time a new issue of AJHP, Pharmacotherapy, JAMA, etc. is available I see the contents in my Google Reader feed.
3)Â Â Â Â Â Starred items â€“ When I find an article worth saving I can quickly save it as a favorite (star it). The article no longer appears in my feed because itâ€™s been read, but I can quickly access it if I need it. I use this quite a bit to hang onto articles for my Saturday Morning Coffee posts. I see something during the week that I want to mention, I â€œstar itâ€ and then pull it up on Saturday morning when Iâ€™m ready to use it. The beauty of it is that itÂ doesn’tÂ clutter up my feed, but itâ€™s quickly accessible.
4)Â Â Â Â Â Tags â€“ Google Reader offers a quick and easy way to save articles and sort them: tags. This is similar to Gmail and Evernote. Itâ€™s very convenient. I canâ€™t count the number of articles I have saved. With Googleâ€™s search capabilities itÂ doesn’tÂ matter how many I save because all I have to do is search my tagged articles for the item Iâ€™m looking for. I frequently use tags to collect information for presentations. For example, Iâ€™m giving a presentation in May at the Southern California chapter of HIMSS. Iâ€™ve created a tag called â€œSoCal HIMSSâ€. When I see something that might fit into my presentation I simply tag it SoCal HIMSS. Done. Itâ€™s saved and I can pull it up and look at it anytime I want.
5)Â Â Â Â Â Google Alerts â€“ I love roaming around the internet, but I canâ€™t possibly search every website for interesting information. InsteadÂ I’veÂ set up several Google Alerts using keywords of interest â€“ Pharmacy, Robotics, HIT, Informatics, Big Data, etc. When Google finds a new article on the web that contains one of my keywords it sends it to my Google Reader feed where they sit patiently until I’m ready to read them. This is a great way to find information that I would have otherwise missed.
6)Â Â Â Â Â Control of social media â€“ Google Reader’s integration with my social media feeds is crazy good. I can share links and articles directly from Google Reader to any of my favorite social media sites including Google+, Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook and App.net.Â I use this feature all the time, and Iâ€™m finding it difficult to replace. This is important to me.
Finding a replacement for everything I do in Google Reader is starting to look like an impossible task.Â I’veÂ had many people make recommendations, and I am thankful, but nothing fits the bill. I donâ€™t want pretty pictures like Feedly, Currents, Flipboard, and so on. I find those services cool, and I use them, but they’re not the same thing. Theyâ€™re fun to browse around in while I sip coffee in the morning, or when I just want something different, but they are not designed for mass consumption of information quickly.
I suppose I need to say thank you to Google for providing me with so many great services for free, but I have to say Iâ€™m bummed.
4 thoughts on “The loss of Google Reader will be tough and hereâ€™s why”
I’m right there with you, Jerry. I use Feedly on my phone but its just not the same. I’ll be watching to see what you end up migrating to…
Well said Jerry. I completely agree with you. Reader is fast and efficient, it’s a great product. I’m disappointed too.
Funny thing is, now i’m hearing about these plugins and scripts – i’m curious, but of course it’s too late.
Hope you find a replacement in time.
Hi Jerry, have you taken a look at Flipboard lately? It seems to be developing itself to try to replace some (or all) of the functionality of Google Reader. I haven’t yet got around to trying its new stuff yet, but I like the way it presents all my other social media feeds, so I’m hopeful it may be a Reader substitute.
Hi Pauline! It’s been a while. I’ve tried Flipboard. Not bad. I’m just not a big fan of using the graphical tiles as a way to get through information. It does some of what I want, but not all of it. I’m just whining. Things change. I just need to get over it and move on. The Old Reader is pretty good, but they haven’t been able to keep up with demand. Tried Feedly, and it’s not a great replacement either. Good to hear from you. – Jerry