Augmented reality has potential for use in pharmacy

Augmented reality has been a standard of science fiction for decades, but now it’s a reality. We all remember the Starbucks app that made the Red Holiday Cup come to life last year, right? If not here’s a video on YouTube. Of course that’s just the tip of the iceberg as Google and Microsoft have both started playing with the concept; Google with Project Glass and Microsoft by filing a patient with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for “event augmentation with real-time information” last year. Google’s Project Glass was even named one of 2012’s best inventions by TIME.

Setting aside the marketing hype for such things for a minute consider the practical uses in pharmacy practice for something like Google’s Project Glass. Imagine two similar, but distinctly different scenarios:

Scenario #1 – In the pharmacy: A technician, or pharmacist, could wear something like this to positively identify items throughout the pharmacy during the routine course of their work. Reach for the wrong bottle of something and get a warning. View patient information based on what’s in your hand. Pull up patient profiles without having to use a keyboard, mouse, or chart. It’s a simple, yet efficient use of readily available technology to improve safety and improve access to patient information. Imagine looking at a patient during rounds and having their active medications, allergy history, etc pop up in your glasses. Or having the ability to view the IV compounding process in picture or video when viewing the finished product; telepharmacy via your glasses. What a concept.

Scenario #2 – In the home: A patient could utilize such technology in a similar fashion. Imagine having medication reminders pop up in their glasses. Think improved adherence. Then imagine a patient with many different medications receiving direction when they go to retrieve a medication bottle from their shelf. If they reach for the wrong bottle they get a warning. When they have the correct medication in hand they get a green light along with directions for use and any other tidbits of information they might need; with or without food, no alcohol, may cause drowsiness, etc. Imagine such technology to assist patient when measuring liquid medications for oral or injectable use; insulin for example. This would go a long way in preventing acetaminophen overdoses from parents that accidentally use the wrong measuring device with the wrong concentration. What a concept, a virtual pharmacist in your direct line of sight.

Working on something so unique, and potentially groundbreaking would be exciting. I hope to see something like this before I retire from practice or at the very least before I die.

It’s not science fiction anymore.

Comments

5 responses to “Augmented reality has potential for use in pharmacy”

  1. You’re right, it’s not science fiction anymore. But, think about this.

    Scenario #1 – a robot replacing the pharmacist/tech as a less costly way to perform the same functions.

    Scenario #2 – Technology is too expensive for individual patients, or patients are incapable of using such sophisticated technology. Perhaps care-givers (nurses/aides) could use this type of technology to improve patient care.

    Scenario #3 – Pharmacists become obsolete.

  2. Jerry Fahrni

    You’re such a downer, dude!

    Here’s my follow up thoughts…to your thoughts….about my thoughts:

    1 – Likely to happen, but that won’t remove clinicians from the patient bedside. AR has potential there as well. In the acute care pharmacy? Who knows.
    2 – True, but consider how expensive some technology was prior to becoming common place. Take VCR’s for example. My grandparents paid nearly $800 for a VCR from Radio Shack in the early 80’s. I needed one for something about a year ago, cost me $30. I agree that caregivers would likely utilize this before patients, but there’s always a segment of the population that will adopt technology regardless of the cost; just look at all the morons that buy Crapple stuff. And consider the potential cost savings to insurance companies for a moment. Would you (insurance company) spend $1500 on something that may prevent a $10K readmission? Probably, given the right circumstances.
    3- I see this as a likely scenario. Hopefully I’ll be retired first.

    JF

  3. carla

    I like the idea of using this kind of system for med adherence.

    I think the readmission angle is a good one. There are several “home dispensing” devices out there in the 1500-2000 price point and I think the companies that make them struggle to get broad adoption because of cost issues. If Payers could see some evidence based outcomes – maybe through some payment “bundling” with health systems – this could serve as a gateway to this kind of system.

  4. “You’re such a downer, dude!”

    LOL! But I’m so aptly named, right?

    I don’t “want” these things to happen to pharmacists, it’s just that I can see the writing on the wall. Although no one wants to hear bad news, someone has to point out the other side of the coin.

    And it’s not just me being able to see what’s coming down the road.

  5. Brannon Hudson

    You’re not a downer, Jason. You’re a realist. You beat me to posting your revised scenario #1 and #2 and the logical scenario #3.

    BLH

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.